Study results were misinterpreted
- David S Wald, specialist registrar in cardiology (davidwald@hotmail.com),
- Malcolm Law, professor,
- Joan Morris, senior lecturer,
- Nicholas J Wald, professor
- Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD
- Department of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, London EC1M 6BQ
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
EDITOR—Hung et al conclude that their cohort study on serum folate and coronary heart disease provides evidence against the view that folic acid prevents coronary heart disease.1 We disagree and believe they have misinterpreted their results.
A meta-analysis of studies on homocysteine and cardiovascular disease, supported by others,2–4 together with randomised trial evidence on folic acid dose and serum homocysteine reduction, shows that the maximal homocysteine lowering effect of folic acid occurs at a dose of about 0.8 mg/day (which increases serum folate by 20 µg/l).5 This homocysteine reduction lowers the risk of coronary heart disease by about 16%. The difference in average serum folate between the highest and the lowest folate group in the cohort study of Hung et al was about 7 µg/l, since the …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27