Peer review should not be anonymousBMJ 2003; 326 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7393.824/b (Published 12 April 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;326:824
- Harry Morrow Brown, consultant allergist ([email protected])
- Highfield House, Highfield Gardens, Derby DE22 1HT
EDITOR—With reference to the news item by White,1 peer review may be necessary, but it is open to bias and abuse, especially when referees are anonymous. To shelter under a cloak of anonymity is cowardly, and it is …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial