Education And Debate Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions BMJ 2003; 326 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7392.756 (Published 05 April 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;326:756 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles No related articles found. See more Return of the “firm” gets cautious welcome BMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i6556; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6556 Cancer drugs remain FDA approved despite lack of benefit, study finds BMJ December 06, 2016, 355 i6568; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6568 Whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6483; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6483 Five thousand dead and counting: the Philippines’ bloody war on drugs BMJ November 28, 2016, 355 i6177; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6177 Fair vaccine pricing please, not random acts of charity BMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6173; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6173 Cited by... Methodological review to develop a list of bias items used to assess reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: protocol and rationaleAbstract Fulltext PDF Relative Effectiveness and Safety of Chemotherapy in Elderly and Nonelderly Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: A Systematic ReviewAbstract Fulltext PDF Standing on the shoulders of giants: Introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analysesAbstract Fulltext PDF How to undertake a systematic review in an occupational settingAbstract Fulltext PDF