Agreeing objectives could help doctors and managers work well together
- Hugo Mascie-Taylor, trust medical director
- Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF
- Mill Stream Surgery, Benson, Oxfordshire OX10 6RL
- University of Exeter, Exeter EX2 5EQ
- Highgate Medical Centre, Sileby, Loughborough LE12 7UD
- Department of Social Medicine, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
EDITOR—Doctors and managers obviously need to work together. To have two powerful groups not working together is likely to frustrate the efforts of both and to damage the service offered to patients. Why then is the relationship between doctors and managers often strained and currently perceived to be at a low ebb? Why is it that two groups, both protesting a desire to put patients at the centre of decision making, often find it difficult to find common ground?

(Credit: KEVIN NICHOLSON/BMJ)
Although doctors and managers apparently agree about the objectives of the NHS, the reality is that the views of the medical profession about its purpose are different from those of managers. This is not surprising given the different backgrounds of doctors and managers.
Doctors are trained in medicine; they tend to be numerate and are trained in the scientific method. They are socialised into a professional model that values both individual and professional autonomy. Many value medicine more highly than they do the NHS. Some perceive themselves as advocates for their patients in the face of governmental and managerial intervention.
Contrast this with managers, who are essentially selected for various characteristics, including good communication skills, ability to create change, and assertiveness, as well as a knowledge and experience of how the NHS functions. Managers have a clear sense of hierarchy and are less concerned with personal or professional autonomy. They recognise lines of accountability and accept that these extend outside their organisation, ultimately to the secretary of state and to government.
How can …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Darwin’s illness revisited
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (6 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012