Press

Fresh row over prostate screening

BMJ 2003; 326 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7389.605 (Published 15 March 2003)
Cite this as: BMJ 2003;326:605.1

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Simon Chapman, professor of public health (simonc@health.usyd.edu.au)
  1. University of Sydney, Australia

    Professor's admission challenges Australia's reverence for medical tests

    In 2001 Michael Wilkes and Gavin Yamey, then editors of the Western Journal of Medicine, argued in the San Francisco Chronicle that there was no good evidence to screen healthy men for prostate cancer. Their article provoked an enormous backlash and they were subject to some particularly vicious lobbying and character assassination. They were said to be promoting “geriatricide,” and efforts were made to have them sacked (BMJ 2002;324:431).

    In Australia in recent weeks, it has been the turn of Professor Alan Coates, chief executive of the Cancer Council Australia, the …

    Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

    Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL