- Claudio Violato, professor (violato@ucalgary.ca)a,
- Jocelyn Lockyer, associate professora,
- Herta Fidler, coordinator—evaluation, research and special projectsb
- a Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
- b Office of Continuing Medical Education and Professional Development, University of Calgary
- Correspondence to: C Violato
- Accepted 10 December 2002
The assessment and maintenance of competence of physicians has received worldwide attention,1–4 partly in response to concerns about poor performance by physicians and the safety of patients 5 6 and partly as a result of demands for accountability to patients and funding agencies.2–4 New approaches to quality improvement have resulted, as have initiatives focusing on identifying and assessing poor performance.7–9
Throughout the Western world, thinking about competence has shifted. Medical expertise and clinical decision making are increasingly recognised as only components of competence. Communication skills, interpersonal skills, collegiality, professionalism, and a demonstrated ability to continuously improve must also be considered when assessing physicians. 2–4 7 8 10 11
Multisource feedback, using questionnaire data from patients, medical colleagues, and coworkers, is gaining acceptance and credibility as a means of providing primary care physicians with quality improvement data as part of an overall strategy of maintaining competence and certification. 1 7 8 Work with Canadian, American, and Scottish generalist physicians shows that this method is reliable, valid, and feasible. 7 8 12–15 Research in both industry and medicine shows that multisource feedback systems (or 360° feedback) can result in individual improvement and the adoption of new practices. 12 16–18
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, the statutory medical registration body for the province of Alberta, adopted a performance appraisal or multisource feedback system for all physicians in its jurisdiction—the physician achievement review program. This system focuses on quality improvement and operates entirely separately from the …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27