Papers

Systematic review of lipid lowering for primary prevention of coronary heart disease in diabetes

BMJ 2003; 326 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7388.528 (Published 08 March 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;326:528
  1. Apoor S Gami, instructor in medicinea,
  2. Victor M Montori, assistant professorb,
  3. Patricia J Erwin, head reference librarianc,
  4. Mehmood A Khan, associate professorb,
  5. Steven A Smith, associate professor (smith.steven{at}mayo.edu)b

    for the Evidence in Diabetes Enquiry System (EVIDENS) Research Group

  1. a Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester MN 55905, USA
  2. b Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, Nutrition, and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic
  3. c Mayo Medical Libraries, Mayo Clinic
  1. Correspondence to: S A Smith
  • Accepted 17 January 2003

Patients with diabetes are at high risk of coronary heart disease. Leading organisations have recommended that all diabetic patients should be treated as aggressively as patients with established coronary heart disease.1 Randomised trials have shown the efficacy of reducing low density lipoprotein concentrations in patients without coronary heart disease. Large trials and meta-analyses of such trials would be expected to provide information on diabetic patients. We therefore systematically examined the available data on lowering low density lipoprotein concentrations in diabetic patients without coronary heart disease.

Methods and results

The review protocol is available from the authors. We searched Medline and eight other electronic databases (including five clinical trials databases) and proceedings from pertinent scientific meetings. We attempted to contact the authors of trials reporting incomplete data but received no responses. We reviewed the bibliographies of all retrieved publications.

Eligible trials randomised patients to lipid lowering interventions; included patients without coronary heart disease; and measured myocardial infarction, death from coronary heart disease, or all cause mortality. Eligible meta-analyses pooled data from similar trials. We excluded studies available only as abstracts. There were no language exclusions. We also included the Medical Research Council/British Heart Foundation heart protection study, which was published after our search.2 A list of included trials and meta-analyses is available on bmj.com

The 14 eligible trials randomised 132 977 patients without coronary heart disease, and diabetes status was stated for 1799 patients (1.3%). Three trials provided clinical endpoints for 454 diabetic patients. In addition, the heart protection study randomised 3982 diabetic patients without coronary heart disease (table).

Randomised controlled trials of lipid lowering for primary prevention of coronary heart disease. Data for patients without coronary heart disease at baseline

View this table:

We found 13 meta-analyses that included up to 38 trials and 146 854 patients. None presented data for diabetes subgroups. One meta-analysis postulated that diabetes might account for differences between trials, but incomplete reporting in the trials limited the analysis.

Comment

Inclusion and reporting biases in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses limited our assessment of the efficacy of lowering low density lipoprotein concentration in diabetic patients without coronary heart disease. Most trials of lipid lowering interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease excluded diabetic patients by varied and ambiguous criteria. Consequently, these trials included few patients with diabetes. Those who were included were poorly characterised in terms of type and duration of diabetes, severity of complications, and metabolic control. It is therefore unclear whether the diabetes subgroups represent the general diabetic population.

The meta-analyses were also affected by the limitations described above. In addition, outcome was reported for only one third of diabetic participants. Consequently, these meta-analyses cannot overcome the biases against diabetes in the original trials.

Current recommendations to manage dyslipidaemia in diabetic patients are based on observational evidence and expert judgment. The heart protection study showed that simvastatin significantly reduced the risk of major vascular events for diabetic patients without coronary heart disease at any initial low density lipoprotein concentration. It remains unclear whether the benefits of statins are mediated by lowering low density lipoprotein concentrations, whether goals of treatment should be expressed as low density lipoprotein concentrations, and whether a fixed dose of statin, increasing doses of statin, or multiple drugs can be used to achieve these goals with acceptable safety. Recommendations from policymakers and experts should reflect this uncertainty.

Acknowledgments

Contributors: ASG and VMM contributed to the design of the study, collection and assembly of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the article. PJE participated in the design of the study and collection and assembly of data. MAK took part in the analysis and interpretation of data and drafting of the article. SAS contributed to the design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting of the article. All authors approved the final manuscript. SAS is the guarantor.

Footnotes

  • Funding American Diabetes Association and Mayo Foundation. The guarantor accepts full responsibility for the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethical approval The study did not involve human subjects or patients' records. The institutional review board of the Mayo Clinic approved the study.

  • Embedded Image The studies included in the review are listed on bmj.com

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.