Editorials

Ottawa ankle rules for the injured ankle

BMJ 2003; 326 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7386.405 (Published 22 February 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;326:405

Useful clinical rules save on radiographs and need to be used widely

  1. John Heyworth, consultant in emergency medicine
  1. Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD

    Papers p 417

    What could possibly be more straightforward than the assessment of an injured ankle? Patients with ankle injuries, usually sustained recreationally or in a simple fall, attend emergency departments throughout the world in their hundreds of thousands every year. Most of these patients will have sustained simple injury to ligamentous soft tissue or a small avulsion fracture of no clinical significance. A minority will have sustained more serious fractures, requiring immobilisation or internal fixation. Patients with ankle injury constitute approximately 5% of all patients who visit emergency departments, although fewer than 15% of these patients will have clinically significant fractures.

    Differentiating between these two groups of patients is not always easy, particularly for relatively inexperienced clinicians. The safety net for indeterminate examination has always been recourse to radiography. However, such an unselective policy has resulted in inestimable numbers of unnecessary exposures to radiation for …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe