Clinical Review

Lesson of the week

Misdiagnosis of epilepsy in patients prescribed anticonvulsant drugs for other reasons

BMJ 2003; 326 doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7384.326 (Published 8 February 2003)
Cite this as: BMJ 2003;326:326.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. M Oto (meritxelloto@hotmail.com), research fellow,
  2. A J C Russell, consultant neurophysiologist,
  3. A McGonigal, neurology specialist registrar,
  4. R Duncan, lead clinician
  1. West of Scotland Regional Epilepsy Service, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow G51 4TF
  1. Correspondence to: M Oto
  • Accepted 1 August 2002

Doctors must be clear to patients and other doctors when prescribing anticonvulsants for conditions other than epilepsy

Up to a fifth of patients referred to neurology clinics with refractory epilepsy have psychogenic non-epileptic seizures.1 Sexual abuse has been suggested as a cause in some patients,2 but in many the aetiology remains unclear.

Anticonvulsant drugs are now commonly used for indications such as pain or stabilising mood.3 We describe two patients who were prescribed anticonvulsants for reasons other than epilepsy and who went on to develop blackouts that were misdiagnosed as epilepsy. Misinterpretation of anticonvulsant treatment as evidence for epilepsy was a crucial factor.

Case reports

The patients were assessed at the Glasgow non-epileptic seizures clinic between January 2000 and May 2001. Video electroencephalography confirmed the diagnosis of non-epileptic seizures. Prolonged interictal electroencephalographic recording and detailed analysis of eyewitness accounts of attacks showed no evidence of concomitant epilepsy.

Case 1

A 62 year old man with no predisposing factors for epilepsy had a history of insulin dependent diabetes. He was prescribed carbamazepine in January 1998 to control his severe neuropathic pain. In June 1999, he developed brief attacks, which consisted of tremor with occasional loss of responsiveness. Investigations included brain computed tomography and electroencephalography. His computed tomographic appearances were normal. Two attacks occurred during electroencephalography, and no epileptiform abnormality was seen. Despite this, the patient was referred to a neurologist with …

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

Subscribe

Article access

Article access for 1 day

Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

* Prices do not include VAT

Rapid responses

THIS WEEK'S POLL

BMJ most popular