- Janice Rymer (janice.rymer@kcl.ac.uk), senior lecturera,
- Ruth Wilson, professorb,
- Karen Ballard, director of postgraduate studiesc
- a Guy's, King's and St Thomas's School of Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas's Hospital Trust, London SE1 7EH
- b Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- c Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy's, King's and St Thomas's School of Medicine, King's College London SE11 6SP
- Correspondence to: J Rymer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Thomas's Hospital, London SE1 7EH
Since hormone replacement therapy was introduced 70 years ago, a steady flow of studies has produced evidence of both harmful and beneficial effects. Recent British studies have shown that 60% of women aged 51–7 years have taken hormone replacement therapy,1 with 45% having tried it by the time they are 50.2 In the United States, about 38% of postmenopausal women take hormone replacement therapy. In 2000, 46 million prescriptions were written for Premarin (conjugated equine oestrogens), making it the second most frequently prescribed drug in the United States.3
Women are increasingly encouraged to participate in making decisions about hormone replacement therapy. However, the complexity and uncertainty of information about the treatment can make it difficult for women to make a decision, increasing their reliance on medical advice.4 The publication of the heart and oestrogen-progestin replacement study (HERS)5 and women's health initiative (WHI)6 study, both of which found adverse effects, has added to the confusion. In this article, we define who should be offered hormone replacement therapy and why, describe the reasons why women may wish to take hormone replacement therapy, and clarify the advantages and disadvantages of treatment.
Summary points
Hormone replacement therapy can improve the quality of life of women with hypo-oestrogenic symptoms
Long term hormone replacement therapy should be offered to women at high risk of osteoporosis or with established osteoporosis
Hormone replacement therapy should not be offered for prevention of cardiovascular disease or to women with a high risk of cardiovascular disease
Long term treatment is associated with increased incidence of breast cancer
Women should be counselled about the risks, benefits, and uncertainties of hormone replacement therapy before deciding to start …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012