Letters

Association between competing interests and conclusions

BMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7377.1420 (Published 14 December 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:1420

See also editorial by Smith

Denominator problem needs to be addressed

  1. Benjamin Djulbegovic, associate professor of oncology and medicine (djulbebm@moffitt.usf.edu)
  1. H Lee Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA

EDITOR—During my personal exchange of material with Kjaergard and Als-Nielsen (I provided them with the equipoise scale, our data extraction forms, etc), I commented that their association between authors' competing interests and conclusions could have been explained by at least two additional types of bias. The first is pervasive authors' self selection bias (the authors tend to send their best pieces to a high impact journal such as the BMJ) and the second is the bias of the BMJ's editors.1

The major problem with this type of research is that its results can never be completely reliable until the problem of denominators is addressed. The journal editors' decision accepting or rejecting a given paper for publication can potentially seriously skew the distribution of studies with negative and positive results. I believe that the editors of the BMJ have a unique opportunity to inform …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial

Subscribe