Letters

Authors' reply on reducing adolescent unintended pregnancy

BMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7374.1243/a (Published 23 November 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:1243
  1. Alba DiCenso, professor, school of nursing (dicensoa@mcmaster.ca),
  2. Gordon Guyatt, professor, department of clinical epidemiology and biostatistics
  1. McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5

    EDITOR—Noar points out that control participants in most studies in our systematic review received conventional sex education. 1 2 Therefore, the appropriate conclusion is that more intensive, theory based programmes do not improve outcomes beyond what is achieved by conventional programmes. We agree, and we said so in our paper.2

    Noar challenges us to provide an …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe