A paper that changed my practice, twiceBMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7374.1240 (Published 23 November 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:1240
- Alex Clark, senior house officer in general medicine (firstname.lastname@example.org)
- Royal Preston Hospital
As a newly qualified preregistration house officer, alone on an orthopaedic ward one weekend, I was asked to review a patient complaining of pleuritic chest pain. This meant considering a short list of differential diagnoses to treat or exclude. Among these, of course, was pulmonary embolism, hence a D-dimer test seemed relevant. I can't remember much about this specific encounter, but I know I thought, worried, and procrastinated for as long as it took for the blood results to come back. Then I bleeped the medical registrar to ask what to do about the abnormal D-dimer test result.
The most memorable part of the encounter was …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Sign up for a free trial