Rejection of the consultant contract starts a new era
- Richard Smith, editor
- BMJ
News p 1053 Reviews p 1120
”Take back your mink, take back your pearls
What made you think that I was one of those girls?”
From the musical Guys and Dolls
English and Welsh consultants last week rejected the new consultant contract by two to one.1 Specialist registrars, the consultants of the future, rejected it by more than five to one. But consultants from Scotland and Northern Ireland voted for the contract, hastening the pace of devolution. The contract had been negotiated over two years and endorsed by the BMA's central consultants and specialists committee. Peter Hawker, chairman of the committee, resigned when the vote was announced. The resounding rejection of the contract in England and Wales raises difficult questions for the NHS, the government, and the BMA and probably starts a new era of local negotiation and possibly of a junior consultant grade.
Why was the contract rejected?
In essence, the new contract offered more money in return for accepting greater managerial control and the potential to be obliged to work unsocial hours.2 Although those who negotiated the contract urged consultants to accept it, the junior doctors committee immediately rejected it.3 Feedback from consultants to the BMJ and other publications and websites was consistently negative, 4 5 and it was no surprise when the contract was rejected.
It wasn't rejected because of money. Consultants famously had their mouths “stuffed with gold” at the start of the NHS, but this time they've sent back the mink and the pearls. Nor was it rejected because of minor restrictions on private practice. It was rejected primarily because it gave more control to managers, people who in many hospitals are neither trusted nor respected. This might be seen as a simple power struggle, with consultants refusing to be told what …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012