Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres

BMJ 2002; 325 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7370.961 (Published 26 October 2002)
Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:961

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. John E Wennberg (john.Wennberg@Dartmouth.edu), director
  1. Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences, 7251 Strasenburgh, Dartmouth Medical School 03755-3863

    Everyday clinical practice is characterised by wide variations that cannot be explained by illness severity or patient preference. Professor Wennberg examines the causes for these variations and suggests ways to remedy the situation

    Academic medicine has had only limited success in improving the scientific basis of everyday clinical practice, even within the walls of its own hospitals. Patterns of practice among academic medical centres—as among other institutions—are often idiosyncratic and unscientific, and local medical opinion and local supply of resources are more important than science in determining how medical care is delivered. In short, after nearly 100 years of academic medicine as we know it, much of medicine in the United States remains empirical.

    The evaluative clinical sciences—those disciplines whose role in medicine is to evaluate medical theory, understand patient preferences, and improve systems—are capable of improving the scientific basis of clinical practice and warrant high priority in the national research agenda and full adoption into medical school curriculums. These sciences are essential to the development of organised healthcare systems in the 21st century, not least because they expose unwarranted variations in care and can be used to remedy them.

    Summary box

    • Much of clinical medicine remains empirical, and everyday practice is characterised by wide variations that have no basis in clinical science

    • Patients served by even the best academic centres (teaching hospitals) experience unwarranted variations in health care and health outcomes

    • The evaluative sciences should be on national research agendas and medical school curriculums

    • Academic medical centres should start to lobby for this mandate and become advocates for reform

    I will begin with a summary of the facts of unwarranted variations in clinical practice, derived from the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care project, a US national study of traditional (fee for service) Medicare. The atlas project reports on the rates of …

    Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

    Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL