- Thomas G Rundall, professor (trundall@uclink.berkeley)a,
- Stephen M Shortell, professora,
- Margaret C Wang, research assistanta,
- Lawrence Casalino, assistant professorb,
- Thomas Bodenheimer, clinical professor of family and community medicinec,
- Robin R Gillies, research directora,
- Julie A Schmittdiel, research assistanta,
- Nancy Oswald, presidentd,
- James C Robinson, professora
- aUniversity of California at Berkeley, School of Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Management, 140 Warren Hall, Berkeley, California, USA 94720-7360
- bThe University of Chicago, Department of Health Studies, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2007, Chicago, Illinois, USA 60637
- cUniversity of California at San Francisco, Building 80-83, San Francisco General Hospital, 101 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California, USA 94110
- dHealthcare Consulting, 61 Rock Lane, Berkeley, California, USA 94708
- Correspondence to: T G Rundall
Innovations in care management processes have improved the care of patients with chronic illnesses, but many patients still do not receive these benefits. The authors have studied the barriers and facilitators to implementing these improvements in leading US physician practices
About 125 million of the 276 million people living in the United States have some type of chronic illness (table 1).1 Four chronic conditions affect nearly half of Americans with a chronic disease: asthma, depression, and diabetes each affect about 15 million,2–4 while five million have congestive heart failure.5 In 1999 these four chronic diseases were directly responsible for 140 000 deaths in the United States6 and generated at least $173bn (£108bn, €170bn) in medical and other costs. 5 7–9
Over the past decade the effectiveness of care for patients with these and other major chronic illnesses has been improved by innovations in care management processes such as the use of guidelines, disease management techniques, case management, and patient education to improve self management of chronic disease.10 However, many patients are not benefiting from these advances. Recent studies indicate that fewer than half of US patients with asthma, depression, and diabetes receive appropriate treatment.11–13 Organisational characteristics of physician practices associated with effective chronic disease care include the use of patient care teams, supportive information systems, and a high volume of patients.14 Hence, we expect that in the United States moderate and large sized, well organised, multispecialty practices are likely to offer chronic disease care that is as good as it gets and provide other physician organisations with benchmarks against which performance can be measured.
Summary points
Many patients with chronic diseases are not benefiting from effective care management processes
Among leading physician practices in the United States, examples …
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27