Effect of a multifaceted approach to detecting and managing depression in primary care

doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7370.951

From trainee to consultant, BMJ Group offers doctors around the world tailored information, special events, learning resources and recruitment services at every step along their career path.

... by doctors, for doctors, for patients
We are open for entries!

Online learning

BMJ Learning

High-quality CME / CPD for doctors and other healthcare professionals. BMJ Learning features hundreds of accredited, peer-reviewed learning modules in text, video, and audio formats. Find out more

Courses and Qualifications

BMJ Masterclasses

BMJ Masterclasses, led by experts, help clinicians to use the latest evidence and recent guidelines in practice and meet their CPD/CME requirements. Find out more

Exam Preparation

The leading provider of online exam preparation, helping over 167,000 healthcare professionals to pass their exams. Find out more

onExamination

Search all BMJ education articles:

From

Limit by

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Jan Scott, professor of psychological treatments research (j.scott{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk)a,
Alison Thorne,, research and development workerb,
Peter Horn,, consultant psychiatristc

^aDivision of Psychological Medicine, PO 96, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF,
^bWhole System Mental Health Project, North Tyneside NE29 0DW
^cFriarage Hospital, Northallerton DL6 1JG

Correspondence to: J Scott

Accepted 27 June 2002

Abstract

Abstract Problem: Need to improve the detection and management of depression in primary care.

Design: Prospective, before and after study of changes in detection and management following attempts to introduce a chronic disease management approach.

Background and setting: Two representative general practices in the north east of England that differed markedly in resources available and populations served.

Key measures of improvement: Number of cases on a depression register, number of cases accurately diagnosed, adherence to own clinical management guidelines.

Strategies for change: Multifaceted intervention to meet the needs of each practice modified by in-house steering group, including resources to develop a case register, an education and training programme on detection and management agreed by consensus, facilitation of meetings with secondary care staff, and support in developing a practice guideline.

Effects of change: Practice A (with six partners and serving a predominantly affluent white British population) improved case detection rate by 23%, reduced prescribing of sub-therapeutic doses of antidepressants by 36%, and adhered to the preferred treatment regimens. At Practice B (with three partners and two surgeries located in deprived urban inner city areas with high levels of unemployment and large ethnic minority populations) improvement in the sensitivity of case detection was accompanied by a reduction in specificity. The practice did not reach consensus on its own guideline and was unable to sustain the model.

Lessons learnt: A simple practice based approach improved the detection and management of depression in a team familiar with the philosophy of chronic disease management, with the capacity to commit to the programme, and with a critical mass of team members being open to change. This model failed to affect depression management when staff engagement with the project was passive rather than active and the practice was less well resourced and served an economically deprived and ethnically diverse population.

Footnotes

Funding Newcastle and North Tyneside District Health Authority paid the salary for the project facilitator and met other costs related to the project (such as travel, questionnaires)
Competing interests None declared.