Clinical Review Interpreting the evidence BMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7364.587 (Published 14 September 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:587 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Clinical Review Vulvovaginal candidiasis Published: 14 September 2002; BMJ 325 doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7364.586 See more Constitutional symptoms in a young person BMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i5781; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5781 What it feels like to be an interesting teaching opportunity BMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i6190; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6190 Author’s reply to Dangoor and colleagues BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6508; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6508 Time for guidelines on safety netting? BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6411; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6411 The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight savers BMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425 Cited by... Treatment of tennis elbow: the evidenceFulltext PDF