Ethical conundrums: they just keep on comingBMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7363.0/g (Published 07 September 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:g
Could it be acceptable for the BMJ to continue to employ a statistical adviser who was to give evidence on behalf of the tobacco industry? We faced this problem a few years ago with Ken MacRae, who died earlier this year (27 April, p 1041. Despite being very fond of Ken, our gut reaction was no. We feared the headline: “BMJ adviser paid by tobacco industry.” But then we thought that perhaps statisticians could be like lawyers: legitimately paid to advance an argument in Britain's adversarial legal system.
Our traditional solution to ethical conundrums is to publish the problem and …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial