We're developing ELPS and will soon publish papers shortly after acceptance
- Marcus Müllner, associate editor (marcus.muellner@univie.ac.at),
- Trish Groves, assistant editor (tgroves@bmj.com)
- BMJ
- BMJ
In 1999 the BMJ started using a process called ELPS (electronic long, paper short) to publish shorter, more reader friendly versions of original research papers in the print journal.1 Because readability is just as important on the web, these shorter papers are also published on bmj.com along with their original longer versions. To make this clear to readers of bmj.com we mark the papers “abridged text” and “full text.” Like everything else on bmj.com, both versions of each research paper are freely accessible to everyone. The long versions are indexed for Medline, and are published in full on PubMed Central. Readers and authors seem pleased with ELPS so far, and we are continuing to explore new ways to serve their needs.
In our current ELPS process the long version of the paper, after acceptance, is edited according to BMJ style. We aim to eliminate language ambiguities and correct numerical errors not detected during peer review. After editing the paper is sent to the authors for approval. Then the long paper is shortened by a BMJ editor, and the short version …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Should UK membership exams be held overseas? Yes
Published 9 February 2012
Why not use ultrasound for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer for both the exclusion criteria for recruitment and for diagnosis as outcome variable
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Can the severity of menopausal symptoms be predicted?
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Does the BMJ have a particular ideology to pursue in assisted dying?
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 9 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Wakefield sues BMJ over MMR articles (5 responses)
Published 10 Jan 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012