Recruiting overseas doctors

BMJ 2002; 325 doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7359.290 (Published 10 August 2002)
Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:290

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Overseas or in house? How best to “grow capacity” in the NHS

  1. Rebecca Rosen, fellow in primary care
  1. Kings Fund, London W1G 0AN

    The government has two to three years in which to cut NHS waiting lists—a key measure of the impact of additional spending—before the next election. Success will depend on engaging key stakeholders in the redesign and reorganisation of services. The current policy to increase capacity in the NHS by employing overseas providers makes an interesting case study of the tension between achieving results and engaging professionals.

    The policy aims to use overseas doctors to tackle long waiting times, focusing particularly on ophthalmology and orthopaedics.1 Services will be provided within a financial framework that is guided by the current cost of NHS procedures and will be governed by the same quality standards.

    For policy makers the use of overseas doctors has the key advantage of avoiding the perverse incentive of “rewarding” consultants for undertaking private sector “initiative lists” on NHS patients with long waiting times. With the NHS as the core purchaser and raison d'etreof overseas services, cost and quality specifications can be tight. Furthermore, with workforce as a major constraint on …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL