Mr Milburn's good hospital guide

BMJ 2002; 325 doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7358.230 (Published 3 August 2002)
Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:230

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

One star for trying

  1. Rudolf Klein, visiting professor (Rudolfklein30@aol.com)
  1. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT

    News (p 236)

    The self proclaimed aim of Health Secretary Alan Milburn's star awarding exercise, rating the performance of trusts, is simple. It is “to provide patients and the general public with comprehensive, easily understandable information on the performance of their local health services.”1 No one could argue with that. But execution is another matter. Two dilemmas arise when constructing a summary measure of performance in an organisation as complex and heterogeneous as the NHS. On the one hand, how “comprehensive” can it be while remaining “easily understandable?” Sophistication can all too easily turn into mystification. On the other hand, can the same sort of exercise meet the requirements of the multiple audiences involved? The general public apart, these include ministers and their officials, the boards of trusts as well as the doctors, nurses, and others working in them, and the commissioners of services. Attempting to meet everybody's expectations may mean frustration all round.

    The Department of Health's performance …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL