Haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations in men and women: cross sectional studyBMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7356.137 (Published 20 July 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:137
- a Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
- b Kaiser Permanente, Department of Preventive Medicine, San Diego, CA 92111
- Correspondence to: J Waalen
- Accepted 28 December 2001
Rushton et al found that of all the primates, only in humans do females have lower blood haemoglobin concentrations than males.1 The usual explanation, of the effect of androgens on erythropoiesis, does not explain the difference between species.2 The explanation of Rushton et al of iron deficiency among females, does not withstand scrutiny.1
Participants, methods, and results
We are engaged in a large scale study of iron storage disease in patients attending a health appraisal centre at Kaiser Permanente, San Diego. Approximately 500 000 people, a third of the population of San Diego's metropolitan area, are members of this medical care programme. Patients with Medicare or in an employee group can join. In any four year period, 81% of members over the age of 26 attend the centre. Most members are in good health.3 These patients are an ideal group on which to test the proposal that the difference in haemoglobin values of men and women is largely due to iron deficiency, because we have obtained transferrin saturation and serum ferritin concentrations from all of the patients. So far 26 614 white participants aged 26 to 99 years have been screened.
We used a comprehensive questionnaire and medical records to exclude patients who have diseases that might influence the haemoglobin concentration in the blood. Rheumatoid arthritis (1048 patients) and chronic renal failure (seven patients) were considered to have the greatest chronic effect on the normal iron-haemoglobin relationship. No other exclusions were made.
Of the remaining 25 559 participants, 12 731 were men and 12 828 were women. Part a of the figure shows that mean haemoglobin concentrations are greater in men than in women at any given age. Parts b and c of the figure show an approximate 10 g/l difference in mean haemoglobin concentrations between men and women aged 26 to 55 years at any given transferrin saturation or serum ferritin concentration. This apparent difference in haemoglobin concentration between the sexes, therefore, is not because of iron deficiency. Neither do our data support the suggestion that this sex difference vanishes with age: part d of the figure shows a difference of about 10 g/l exists at each transferrin saturation concentration between men and postmenopausal women older than 55 years.
The evidence does not support the idea that the lower haemoglobin concentrations in women are due to iron deficiency. We agree that iron deficiency is an important health problem, and we have repeatedly made this point over more than 40 years.4
In claiming that humans are the only menstruating primates to have sex differences in haemoglobin values, Rushton et al overlooked a study establishing reference ranges for haemoglobin in cynomolgus macaques.5 In that study, a statistically significant difference of approximately 10 g/l in mean haemoglobin concentrations was found between male macaques (120 g/l) and female macaques (110 g/l) despite similar mean ferritin values between the sexes.5
This is manuscript number 14266-MEM from The Scripps Research Institute.
Contributors: VF directed the collection of the clinical data. EB planned and organised the Scripps-Kaiser Hemochromatosis Study and oversees analyses of all data from the study. JW analysed the data. The paper was written by JW and EB.
Funding Supported by grants DK53505-04, DK 07022–20, and RR00833 from the NIH and supplemented with a grant from the Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and funds from the Stein Endowment Fund.
Competing interests None declared.
Group sizes are on bmj.com