- Theresa M Marteau (theresa.marteau@kcl.ac.uk), professor of health psychologya,
- Ann Louise Kinmonth, professor of general practiceb
- a Psychology and Genetics Research Group, King's College London, London SE1 9RT
- b GP and Primary Care Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 2SR
- Correspondence to: T M Marteau
- Accepted 11 April 2002
The National Screening Committee has recommended a paradigm of informed choice for participants in all screening programmes. Theresa Marteau and Ann Louise Kinmonth examine the potential consequences of applying such a policy to screening for risk of coronary heart disease in primary care
Current recommendations for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease in groups at high risk depend on screening through primary care and provision of risk related advice or treatment.1 Criticisms of these recommendations highlight the lack of evidence for the cost effectiveness of multiple risk factor interventions delivered through primary care. 2 3 We propose that this lack of effectiveness may, in part, reflect how people are invited for screening. The public health approach most often used focuses on maximising participation in screening rather than on informed participation. We consider here the implications of offering primary preventive services for cardiovascular disease within a framework of informed choice.
Summary points
Invitations for cardiovascular screening tend to emphasise the benefits of participation, neglecting the possible harms and uncertainties that such screening entails
A policy shift is occurring towards ensuring that people invited to participate in any screening programme do so on the basis of an informed choice
The impact of conducting cardiovascular screening within an informed choice paradigm is unknown
Presenting the uncertainties associated with the assessment and reduction of cardiovascular risk has the potential to be more cost effective than screening conducted in a traditional, public health paradigm if it results in participants who are more motivated to reduce their risks
It also has the potential to increase inequalities by reducing the number of people most at risk who participate in screening
Evaluation of the operation of an informed choice approach to cardiovascular risk assessment is needed
Methods
We searched Medline and PsycINFO databases for systematic literature reviews relating to …
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The word parameter is almost always wrong.
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 25 May 2012
Re: David Morrell
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illnesses
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Are we nearly there with tranexamic acid?
Published 25 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27