Authors' reply to getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS

BMJ 2002; 324 doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7353.1583 (Published 29 June 2002)
Cite this as: BMJ 2002;324:1583

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Richard G A Feachem, director,
  2. Neelam Sekhri, chief executive officer,
  3. Karen White, programme development officer
  1. Institute for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco and Berkeley, CA 94105, USA
  2. Healthcare Redesign Group, Alameda, CA 94502, USA
  3. Institute for Global Health, University of California

    EDITOR—Our paper comparing the NHS with Kaiser Permanente has generated lively interest and, on the whole, a constructive debate. 1 2 Discerning commentators have noted that further refinement of the data and the analysis (which we strongly advocate) is unlikely to change the basic conclusions. These are that Kaiser Permanente offers improved performance at roughly the same cost and that, therefore, there are probably lessons to be learnt that would benefit the future performance of the NHS. We have further noted from the extensive debate that has followed the publication of …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL