Quality improvement report

Effect of a scoring system and protocol for sedation on duration of patients' need for ventilator support in a surgical intensive care unit

BMJ 2002; 324 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7350.1386 (Published 8 June 2002)
Cite this as: BMJ 2002;324:1386

Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Guttorm Brattebø, consultant anaesthetist (gbra{at}haukeland.no)a,
  2. Dag Hofoss, professorb,
  3. Hans Flaatten, consultant anaesthetista,
  4. Anne Kristine Muri, registered nursea,
  5. Stig Gjerde, consultant anaesthetista,
  6. Paul E Plsek, consultantc
  1. a Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
  2. b HELTEF, Foundation for Health Services Research, PO Box 55, N-1474 Nordbyhagen, Norway
  3. c Paul E Plsek & Associates, 1005 Allenbrook Lane, Roswell, GA 30075, USA
  1. Correspondence to: G Brattebø

    Abstract

    Problem: Need for improved sedation strategy for adults receiving ventilator support.

    Design: Observational study of effect of introduction of guidelines to improve the doctors' and nurses' performance. The project was a prospective improvement and was part of a national quality improvement collaborative.

    Background and setting: A general mixed surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital; all doctors and nurses in the unit; all adult patients (>18 years) treated by intermittent positive pressure ventilation for more than 24 hours.

    Key measures for improvement: Reduction in patients' mean time on a ventilator and length of stay in intensive care over a period of 11 months; anonymous reporting of critical incidents; staff perceptions of ease and of consequences of changes.

    Strategies for change: Multiple measures (protocol development, educational presentations, written guidelines, posters, flyers, emails, personal discussions, and continuous feedback) were tested, rapidly assessed, and adopted if beneficial.

    Effects of change: Mean ventilator time decreased by 2.1 days (95% confidence interval 0.7 to 3.6 days) from 7.4 days before intervention to 5.3 days after. Mean stay decreased by 1.0 day (−0.9 to 2.9 days) from 9.3 days to 8.3 days. No accidental extubations or other incidents were identified.

    Lessons learnt: Relatively simple changes in sedation practice had significant effects on length of ventilator support. The change process was well received by the staff and increased their interest in identifying other areas for improvement.

    Footnotes

    • Funding Norwegian Medical Association and Haukeland University Hospital.

    • Competing interests PEP is also a senior fellow at the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (Boston, USA).

    • Embedded Image Additional figures appear on bmj.com

      Get access to this article and all of bmj.com for the next 14 days

      Sign up for a 14 day free trial today

      Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

      Article access

      Article access for 1 day

      Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

      The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

      * Prices do not include VAT

      THIS WEEK'S POLL