Computed tomography in clinical practiceBMJ 2002; 324 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7345.1077 (Published 04 May 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;324:1077
- Conall J Garvey, consultant radiologist (Conall.firstname.lastname@example.org),
- Rebecca Hanlon, specialist registrar in radiology
- Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP
- Correspondence to: C J Garvey
Since it was first introduced three decades ago, computed tomography has become an important investigative tool. Conall Garvey and Rebecca Hanlon explain different types of scanners and what they are used for
Computed tomography was first introduced 30 years ago and has since become an integral part of clinical practice.1 Because of rapid advances in technology few clinicians are aware of the scope and limitations of the different types of scanners. This review describes the three main types of computed tomographic scanner that are used in routine clinical practice and discusses their use in the investigation of a wide range of different conditions. It also flags up differing views on the relative merits of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.
The role of “conventional” computed tomography is declining and has been superseded by spiral scanning
Multislice scanning is faster and more versatile than spiral scanning and facilitates newer applications, particularly in vascular, cardiac, and colonic imaging
Multislice computed tomography is expensive and has implications for workload and data storage
Concern has been raised about the increasing radiation dose from examinations by computed tomography
As magnetic resonance scanners become faster and availability increases, considerations of dose may relegate computed tomography to a secondary role for many applications
The information contained in this review was gathered from several sources. These include many years of personal experience using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, discussions with manufacturers of equipment, and knowledge of radiation dosimetry issues, supported by a search of Medline and the Cochrane databases for systematic reviews comparing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Evolution of computed tomographic scanners
By today's standards early computed tomographic scanners were extremely slow and required enormous computer facilities to generate comparatively crude scans. Improvements in tube technology and computer hardware and software have shortened scan times and improved the resolution …