Clinical Review

Computed tomography in clinical practice

BMJ 2002; 324 doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7345.1077 (Published 4 May 2002)
Cite this as: BMJ 2002;324:1077

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Conall J Garvey, consultant radiologist (Conall.garvey@rlbuh-tr.nwest.nhs.uk),
  2. Rebecca Hanlon, specialist registrar in radiology
  1. Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP
  1. Correspondence to: C J Garvey

    Since it was first introduced three decades ago, computed tomography has become an important investigative tool. Conall Garvey and Rebecca Hanlon explain different types of scanners and what they are used for

    Computed tomography was first introduced 30 years ago and has since become an integral part of clinical practice.1 Because of rapid advances in technology few clinicians are aware of the scope and limitations of the different types of scanners. This review describes the three main types of computed tomographic scanner that are used in routine clinical practice and discusses their use in the investigation of a wide range of different conditions. It also flags up differing views on the relative merits of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.

    Summary points

    The role of “conventional” computed tomography is declining and has been superseded by spiral scanning

    Multislice scanning is faster and more versatile than spiral scanning and facilitates newer applications, particularly in vascular, cardiac, and colonic imaging

    Multislice computed tomography is expensive and has implications for workload and data storage

    Concern has been raised about the increasing radiation dose from examinations by computed tomography

    As magnetic resonance scanners become faster and availability increases, considerations of dose may relegate computed tomography to a secondary role for many applications

    Methods

    The information contained in this review was gathered from several sources. These include many years of personal experience using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, discussions with manufacturers of equipment, and knowledge of radiation dosimetry issues, supported by a search of Medline and the Cochrane databases for systematic reviews comparing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

    Evolution of computed tomographic scanners

    By today's standards early computed tomographic scanners were extremely slow and required enormous computer facilities to generate comparatively crude scans. Improvements in tube technology and computer hardware and software have shortened scan times and improved the resolution …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular