Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
I read this article (1) and two concerns came into my mind and I would
like to share them with colleagues.
My first concern is about what exactly is the government buying with
all the extra billions it is spending on the NHS? Is it hoping to buy more
medical treatment on behalf of the public? Is it hoping to make the
population healthier by so doing? (2)
If it is the first of these it has some hope of achieving its aims,
although it is not clear where the extra staff are going to be brought
from.
If it is hoping to make a difference to the overall health of the
public by spending through the NHS system it is mistaken. Any illness
treatment system such as the NHS can only deal with the casualties of
life, not with how to live healthily in the first place.(3)
This brings me on to my second concern that simply concentrating on
supply side measures will pander to medical vanity (treatment as all
important)and move thinking away from looking at how and why demand for
medical services arises in the first place.
Unless we as individuals and as a society are able to encompass the
full picture of health, including its environmental factors, its social
relationships and its political and moral dynamics we will continue to
find health puzzling and frustrating.
We must start to examine the sources of demand for health care and
learn to modify these before they reach the level of detectable diseases
at our surgeries and clinics.This will require courageous medicine, and
courageous politics but the price of not doing it will be so great that it
will be heartbreaking for politicians and the public.
Refs
1. Gold for the NHS, Robinson,R BMJ 2002 324:987-8
2. NHS to receive an extra £40bn over next five years. Moore,W BMJ News
2002 324:993
What exactly is being bought with this gold?
Sir,
I read this article (1) and two concerns came into my mind and I would
like to share them with colleagues.
My first concern is about what exactly is the government buying with
all the extra billions it is spending on the NHS? Is it hoping to buy more
medical treatment on behalf of the public? Is it hoping to make the
population healthier by so doing? (2)
If it is the first of these it has some hope of achieving its aims,
although it is not clear where the extra staff are going to be brought
from.
If it is hoping to make a difference to the overall health of the
public by spending through the NHS system it is mistaken. Any illness
treatment system such as the NHS can only deal with the casualties of
life, not with how to live healthily in the first place.(3)
This brings me on to my second concern that simply concentrating on
supply side measures will pander to medical vanity (treatment as all
important)and move thinking away from looking at how and why demand for
medical services arises in the first place.
Unless we as individuals and as a society are able to encompass the
full picture of health, including its environmental factors, its social
relationships and its political and moral dynamics we will continue to
find health puzzling and frustrating.
We must start to examine the sources of demand for health care and
learn to modify these before they reach the level of detectable diseases
at our surgeries and clinics.This will require courageous medicine, and
courageous politics but the price of not doing it will be so great that it
will be heartbreaking for politicians and the public.
Refs
1. Gold for the NHS, Robinson,R BMJ 2002 324:987-8
2. NHS to receive an extra £40bn over next five years. Moore,W BMJ News
2002 324:993
3. The Big Picture of Health. Davies,P Caduceus No55 Spring 2002
(accessible at
http://www.neurosemantics.com/articles/The_Big_Picture_of_Health.htm)
Competing interests: No competing interests