Editorials

Gold for the NHS

BMJ 2002; 324 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7344.987 (Published 27 April 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;324:987

Good news that raises questions on consistency and sustainability

  1. Ray Robinson (r.robinson1@lse.ac.uk), professor of health policy
  1. LSE Health and Social Care, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE

    The chancellor's budget statement sets out plans for unprecedented rates of growth in NHS spending over the medium term. Responding to the Wanless review team's challenge on the long term funding needs of the NHS,1 the chancellor's special, five year settlement for the NHS will mean an extra 7.4% real terms expenditure each year over the period 2003-4 to 2007-8. This will increase the NHS budget from £65bn ($94bn; Embedded Image106bn) this year to £105bn after five years (allowing for inflation) and represent a rise in the share of gross domestic product spent on health care from 7.7% to 9.4%. Some idea of the scale of these increases in expenditure can be gauged from the fact that over the period 1954-2000 annual increases in real expenditure on the NHS averaged 3.7%. If plans are realised, the next five years will double this rate.

    For those who have lamented NHS underfunding over the past 20 years, this is unadulterated good news. …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe