Those who can, do; those who can't, bully
- Tim Field, founder, UK national workplace bullying advice line
- PO Box 67, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 9YS timfield@successunlimited.co.uk
- North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, Harrow HA1 3UJ k.becker@ic.ac.uk
- Maryport, Cumbria CA15 8EL g.mackenzie@eidosnet.co.uk
- BMJ
EDITOR—The experiences of the person who wrote an anonymous personal view about bullying in medicine is one I have heard related to my national workplace bullying advice line many times.1 Nursing and healthcare sector staff comprise about 12% of more than 5000 cases that have been brought to my attention. Bullies are attracted to the caring professions by the opportunities to exercise power over vulnerable clients and over vulnerable employees, who will go to great lengths to protect their relationship with their vulnerable clients.
When a serial bully is present, competent staff (the majority) become disempowered and disenfranchised. No one dares speak up for fear of reprisals. If the writer of the personal view hadn't remained anonymous she would in effect be a whistleblower. Friends of the bully, powerful professionals, and their employers close ranks behind the alleged wrongdoer, and the whistleblower's career is effectively over.
The stereotype of a bully as a tough dynamic manager who gets the job done is slowly changing as we begin to recognise that the sole purpose of bullying is to hide inadequacy and incompetence. Employers are starting to understand the impact on budgets of high staff turnover, high sickness absence, impaired performance, lower productivity, poor team spirit, loss of trained staff to the profession, and increasing litigation by both injured patients and bullied employees.
The stereotype of a “victim” as a weak inadequate person who somehow deserves to be bullied is giving way to the realisation that bullies, who are driven by jealousy and envy, pick on the highest performing and most skilled staff, whose mere presence is sufficient to make the bully feel insecure. Threats (of exposure of inadequacy) must be ruthlessly controlled and subjugated. Those who can, do. Those who can't, …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Hormone replacement therapy - psychiatric aspects
Published 22 February 2012
Re: Assaulting alternative medicine: worthwhile or witch hunt?
Published 22 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 22 February 2012
Re: Assaulting alternative medicine: worthwhile or witch hunt?
Published 22 February 2012
Re: Improving the delivery of safe and effective healthcare in low and middle income countries
Published 22 February 2012
Most responses
Assaulting alternative medicine: worthwhile or witch hunt? (12 responses)
Published 15 Feb 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Raised inflammatory markers (7 responses)
Published 3 Feb 2012
Independence in disciplinary proceedings against doctors (5 responses)
Published 24 Jan 2012