- Jonathan R Benger, specialist registrar in emergency medicine (JB{at}sectae.org.uk)a,
- Alison V Pearce, specialist registrar in paediatricsb
- a Emergency Department, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol BS16 1LE
- b Department of Community Child Health, Frenchay Hospital, Frenchay, Bristol BS16 1LE
- Correspondence to: J Benger, Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8BW
- Accepted 22 November 2001
Abstract
Problem: Child abuse is easily overlooked in a busy emergency department.
Design: Two stage audit of 1000 children before and after introduction of reminder flowchart.
Background and setting: An emergency department in a suburban teaching hospital seeing about 4000 injured preschool children a year.
Key measures for improvement: Number of records in which intentional injury was adequately documented and considered and the number of children referred for further assessment before and after introduction of reminder flowchart into emergency department notes.
Strategies for change: Nurses were asked to insert a reminder flowchart for assessing intentional injury into the notes of all children aged 0-5 years attending the department with any injury and to record the results of checking the child protection register.
Effect of change: Documentation of all eight indicators that intentional injury had been considered had increased in the second audit. Records of compatibility of history with injury and consistency of history increased from less than 2% to more than 70% (P<0.0001). More children were referred for further assessment in the second audit than the first, although the difference was not significant (6 (0.6%) v14 (1.4%), P=0.072). The general level of awareness and vigilance increased in the second audit, even for children whose records did not contain the flowchart.
Lessons learnt: Inclusion of a simple reminder flowchart in the notes of injured preschool children attending the emergency department increases awareness, consideration, and documentation of intentional injury. Rates of referral for further assessment also increase.
Footnotes
-
Funding None.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Details of the children included in the study appear on bmj.com
- Accepted 22 November 2001
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27