Editorials

Falling neonatal autopsy rates

BMJ 2002; 324 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7340.749 (Published 30 March 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;324:749

Neonatologists, pathologists, and relatives need to boost neonatal pathology

  1. T Yee Khong, associate professor of obstetrics and gynaecology and pathology
  1. University of Adelaide, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia

    Papers p 761

    The provision of perinatal and paediatric pathology services is a sign of an enlightened society. It symbolises the care that society attaches to the wellbeing of its young by trying to find out what makes each pregnancy and infancy go well or badly. Yet in their audit of neonatal autopsies in a tertiary referral centre published in this week's BMJ, Brodlie and colleagues found a general fall in autopsy rates over the past decade (p 761).1 This occurred despite a senior clinician always asking relatives for permission for autopsies and the availability of a dedicated paediatric and perinatal autopsy service. What are we as clinicians and as the lay public to make of this?

    Geographical differences may exist in requests for neonatal autopsies. Directors of British neonatal units may have reservations about requesting an autopsy in some cases,2 but Australian neonatologists do not seem to share these.3 Nurses' attitudes may differ from doctors'.3 Grief counsellors, nurses, or social …

    Sign in

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe