All available evidence needs to be evaluated
- Knut Schroeder (k.schroeder@bristol.ac.uk), Medical Research Council training fellow in health services research, division of primary health care,
- Shah Ebrahim, professor in epidemiology of ageing, department of social medicine,
- Tom Fahey, senior lecturer in general practice, division of primary health care,
- Alan Montgomery, Medical Research Council fellow in health services research, department of primary health care,
- Tim Peters, reader in medical statistics, department of social medicine
- University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR
- Department of Psychiatry, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE
- Redcrest, Heath Rise, Camberley, Surrey GU15 2ER
EDITOR—Bloom's editorial is a surprising contribution to the important discussion about how best to improve compliance with treatment in chronic diseases.1 His assertion that fewer daily doses increase compliance, and his notion that the least expensive drugs are usually the least effective and have the highest rate of side effects, cannot go unchallenged.
Bloom cites one of his own studies, funded by a pharmaceutical company, to support the idea that fewer daily doses improve compliance.2 This study was a retrospective analysis of prescription records, which showed higher rates of prescription refill at one year among those treated with once daily versus more frequent dosing and those treated with newer, more expensive drugs. The study was confined to supposedly hypertensive patients younger than 71, but no initial blood pressure values were available, and none of them was evaluated in a standardised manner. Moreover, no blood …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27