- Catherine Campbell (c.campbell@lse.ac.uk), reader in social psychologya,
- Yodwa Mzaidume, outreach coordinatorb
- a London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE,
- b Mothusimpilo Project, c/o Carletonville Hospital, Private Bag X2023, Carletonville, 2500, South Africa
- Correspondence to: C Campbell
- Accepted 8 November 2001
South Africa's lack of government leadership in the fight against HIV and AIDS has resulted in disunity in local HIV/AIDS circles. Catherine Campbell and Yodwa Mzaidume suggest that peer education—with local people taking control of HIV prevention efforts—can be successful but depends on collaboration between many stakeholder groups at local, national, and international level
HIV and AIDS prevention programmes often have little impact because such programmes have traditionally had a biomedical focus and an emphasis on individual behaviour. Yet social and community level factors influence the rate and method of HIV transmission and can affect the success or failure of prevention programmes.
In this paper we discuss the importance of these factors with reference to a South African prevention programme. We argue that HIV prevention efforts are affected by the participation of a wide range of groups and processes at local, national, and international level. The scope of research, interventions, and policies must be widened to take this into account.
Summary points
The participation of local community members is a key element in HIV prevention worldwide
Despite the proliferation of community based approaches to HIV prevention, few studies have examined the role of social factors in a programme's success
In particular, little is known about why community participation affects sexual health
Community led peer education involves training local people to take control of HIV prevention efforts
This type of peer education in marginalised groups can create trusting and cooperative relationships in homogeneous local peer groups
The success of peer education also depends, however, on collaboration among diverse stakeholder groups at local, national, and international level
Community participation
Among marginalised groups in poor countries, providing information about health risks changes the behaviour of, at most, one in four people—generally those who are more affluent and better educated.1 This is because health related behaviours (such …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27