Family friendly hearing seervices are needed in the United Kingdom
- Shamim Amis, specialist registrar obstetrics and gynaecology (shamim@btinternet.com),
- Dominic Byrne, writer and management consultant (dominic@biggerpicture.co.uk)
- Newham General Hospital, London E13 8SL
- 2 Stanstead Grove, London SE6 4UD
- TVW Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, West Perth, Western Australia 6872, Australia
- Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia 6001
EDITOR—We are the parents of a baby with profound sensorineural deafness, and the article by Fortnum et al rang many bells.1 The absence of universal screening of newborn infants seems a national scandal to us. If it had been in place we would not have waited nearly a year to discover that our baby has profound deafness. A year is a long time to lose when the early years are critical to the development of language and speech. The family friendly culture and seamless collaboration aspired to in the pilot protocols for universal screening seem a long way off. Lack of urgency from health professionals, a system that designs delay into it rather than managing delay out, and no real focus on customers or families are the dominant characteristics of the health service we have encountered.
Simple changes could make all the difference. Medical professionals are still dictating letters to secretaries and …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27