Correction to Promoting normality in childbirth
We inadvertently introduced two errors into two references at the end of this editorial by Richard Johanson and Mary Newburn (17 November, pp 1142-3), for which we apologise. In one case (reference 4) we used the wrong reference, and in the other (a Cochrane review, reference 8) we inserted the wrong CD number. The two references should read as follows:
4 Johanson RB, El-Timini S, Rigby C, Young PW, Jones PW. Caesarean section by choice fulfils the inverse care law. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;97:20-2.
8 Hodnett ED. Caregiver support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD000199.
Additionally, the correct name of the journal cited in references 6, 11, and 13 is MIDIRS Midwifery Digest [not Midwifery Digest].







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27