When combined with other information overviews lead to conviction
- Muredach Reilly, instructor in cardiovascular medicine and experimental therapeutics,
- Garret A FitzGerald, Robinette professor of cardiovascular medicine (garret@spirit.gcrc.upenn.edu)
- Center for Experimental Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Papers p 71 Education and debate p 103
The efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke is widely accepted. The evidence which supports this perception includes its identification as an inhibitor of cyclo-oxygenase and platelet aggregation; identification of the major product of platelet cyclo-oxygenase as thromboxane A2, a vasoconstrictor and platelet agonist; the discovery that aspirin irreversibly acetylates cyclo-oxygenase, permitting cumulative inhibition by low doses of thromboxane A2 formation in the presystemic circulation; the discovery that thromboxane A2 biosynthesis is increased during ischaemic episodes of unstable angina; and the demonstration in individual, controlled, prospective double blind trials that aspirin reduces both myocardial infarction and death in unstable angina by 50%, whether given at 75 mg, 324 mg, or 1300 mg/day. 1 2
Following these discoveries Collins, Peto, Baigent, and their colleagues in Oxford organised the Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration to share data and permit overview analyses of controlled trials of antiplatelet drugs. At the time of the initial reports, these trials mainly involved aspirin and confirmed its efficacy in syndromes of acute vascular occlusion such as unstable angina, while suggesting a net benefit in the secondary prevention of stroke.3–5 Today, Baigent and colleagues report further analyses (p 71),6 though a critic …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012