Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Honesty and openness may not be best policy

  1. Graham Ness, clinical lecturer in forensic psychiatry (g.j.ness@sheffield.ac.uk),
  2. Christopher Cordess, chair of academic section of forensic psychiatry
  1. School of Health and Related Research, Sheffield University, Sheffield S1 4DA
  2. Portland Medical Practice, Aldridge, West Midlands WS9 8NS

    EDITOR—We were both surprised by Wilson et al who, in their editorial, ask everybody to send in reports of their errors.1 Our concerns remain regardless of whether or not such accounts are published anonymously. After all, the police have used anonymous medical research data in their investigations. A conviction of culpable and reckless behaviour was secured against a man after he had sexual intercourse with his girlfriend without telling her he was infected with HIV. The scientific evidence that secured the conviction came from confidential research data that were obtained with a police warrant.2

    Furthermore, Wilson et all say that for doctors to report their errors, patient consent will be needed. This means that the patient will know that an account of his or her care …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular