Income, health, and the National Lottery

BMJ 2001; 323 doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1438 (Published 22 December 2001)
Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:1438

This article has a correction

Please see: Income, health, and the National Lottery

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

The lottery is one of the world's largest randomised trials

  1. Anthony Rodgers (a.rodgers@auckland.ac.nz), co-director
  1. Clinical Trials Research Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Most people in the United Kingdom have taken part in one of the world's largest trials of one of the most important determinants of health. Unfortunately, neither the participants nor the organisers know about the trial and no one has collected follow up data.

    Each month, more than £150m is randomly redistributed among 60% of the adult population in the National Lottery.1 Over £16bn has been redistributed since the lottery began in 1994. Changing the redistribution of a small fraction of this money could create a randomised trial that reliably assessed the speed and extent to which increases in income improve health. The basic study design would be simple. Instead of lump sums, winners would receive regular, income-like payments (such as £40, £80, or £160 a month for a decade). Follow up of these winners, and a large random selection of non-winners, would assess effects on outcomes such as diet, smoking, admission to hospital and broader …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL