Updating guidelines on stable anginaBMJ 2001; 323 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7323.1202 (Published 24 November 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:1202
β Blockers are the first choice for regular treatment
- Tim Lancaster, clinical reader in general practice,
- Michael Moher, research fellow
- Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford OX3 7LF
Doctors vary greatly in the way they assess and manage angina.1 The problem is common and serious so valid, clinically useful guidelines are welcome. The North of England Guidelines Group has an impressive record of producing rigorous guidelines for primary care. Today, the updated version of the group's 1996 guideline for managing stable angina is published in full on bmj.com.2 The new guideline extends the literature search from 1994 to 1997. It fulfils the 1996 commitment to an update after three years. How do the two versions compare?
Recommendations for assessment and referral have changed little from 1996. They are closely aligned with those in the British government's national service framework for coronary heart disease.3 The continuing challenge is to implement them. In particular, many areas of the United Kingdom will still find it difficult to meet the recommendation for prognostic exercise testing for all patients with stable angina.
There are few changes to the recommendations for …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial