Effect of a formal education programme on safety of transfusionsBMJ 2001; 323 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1118 (Published 10 November 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:1118
- Peter Clark, consultant haematologist (, )
- Iain Rennie, transfusion nurse specialist,
- Sam Rawlinson, consultant haematologist
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, East of Scotland Blood Transfusion Service, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY
- Correspondence to: P Clark
- Accepted 25 June 2001
Problem: Failure of correct identification and insufficient monitoring of patients receiving transfusions continue to be appreciable and avoidable causes of morbidity and mortality.
Design: A study by a regional transfusion service and a transfusion nurse specialist of the effects of an education programme based on the current national guidelines on identification and monitoring of patients receiving transfusions.
Setting: A large United Kingdom teaching hospital which houses the headquarters of the regional transfusion service.
Key measures for improvement: Improvement in compliance with published national guidelines on the prescription and administration of blood transfusions.
Strategy for change: An audit of current compliance followed by dissemination by a transfusion nurse specialist of a clinical skills package (based on the best practice for transfusion) to all staff involved in giving transfusions. This was supported by trained instructors and the display of standard operating procedures for transfusion in all clinical areas.
Effect of change: An improvement in compliance with the national guidelines to over 95% in six out of seven of the recommendations on best practice was seen 18 months after the initial intervention.
Lessons learnt: The study shows that education of those who prescribe and administer transfusions, as recommended by bodies concerned with the hazards of transfusion, can improve the safety of transfusions.
Funding This initiative was funded by the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service and was recognised as a Clinical Governance Priority for this by the Tayside University NHS Trust.
Competing interests None declared.
- Accepted 25 June 2001
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial