Gatekeeping may not be cost effectiveBMJ 2001; 323 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1090/f (Published 10 November 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:1090
- Deborah Josefson
- San Francisco
Restricting access to specialists through “gatekeeping” does not significantly reduce specialist referrals and is not necessarily cost effective, a new study has said (New England Journal of Medicine 2001;345:1312-7).
Gatekeeping in the United States is the process of requiring insured patients to see a primary care doctor for an initial assessment and examination before being allowed to consult a specialist. As in the NHS in the United Kingdom, the US primary care doctors may choose to treat the patients themselves or to refer them for specialist care. The system has been widely embraced by both health maintenance organisations and traditional insurers as a cost containment method.
In April of 1998 Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, a multispecialty prepaid group practice (previously …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial