- Alexander Kiss, psycho-oncologist (akiss@uhbs.ch)a,
- Siegfried Meryn, general internistb
- a Psychosomatic Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University Clinics Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
- b Centre for Advanced Medical Education and Health Communication, Medical Faculty of the University of Vienna, Borschkegasse 8B, A-1097 Vienna, Austria
- Correspondence to: A Kiss
Being male or female is an important basic human variable that affects health and illness throughout life.1 Men and women differ not only with regard to their reproductive organs and bodies but also in the way they think, feel, and behave. The physical difference is called sex, influenced by genes and biology; the psychological difference is called gender, in which environmental, cultural, and psychosocial factors also have a prominent role. Researchers are just beginning to unravel the complex interactions between sex and gender, and the roles of nature and nuture are still unclear.
- In this window
- In a new window
Biology and epidemiology
In the case of cancer it is obvious that only men can get prostate cancer and breast cancer occurs predominantly in women. How gender matters is not so obvious. In this article we describe the effect of gender on psychosocial differences in men and women with prostate and breast cancer, respectively.
Summary points
Sex and gender based differences have a profound effect on health and disease
The biology and epidemiology of prostate and breast cancer share many similarities
Differences in psychosocial aspects of prostate and breast cancer are mainly based on gender issues
Gender differences are evident not only in the physical impact but also on sex, quality of life, psychosocial differences, coping, and patients' partners
Differences in doctors' attitude and behaviour in the care of men with prostate cancer and women with breast cancer seem to be based on gender
Methods
We reviewed the recent literature concerning psychosocial aspects of prostate and breast cancer. We also incorporated our experiences as a psycho-oncologist and a general internist practising in sex and gender medicine as well as discussions and scientific exchange with colleagues and nurses in these specialties. There are several limitations—for example, both authors are male, which means there is a gender bias; we may be …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012