Which measurements are the most appropriate?
- Michael J White, general practitioner (m.j.white@doctors.org.uk)
- Stakes Lodge Surgery, Waterlooville PO7 8NS
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Medicine, Blenkingesjukhuset, 3748 Karlshamn, Sweden
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
- Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Faculté RTH Laennec, BP 8071-69376, Lyons cedex 08, France
- Hypertension and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, University of Leuven, UZ Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
EDITOR—I would like to predict the risk score for all patients in my practice aged 35 years or older as so clearly described in the article by Pocock et al.1 My enthusiasm invariably turns to disappointment when using risk scores because of the following six factors.
Age—Most of these studies stop at the age of 74. As a significant proportion of my patients are aged 75 and over, I feel cheated. Is there any possibility of extrapolating the risk scores to an older age?
Smoking—Should I include former cigarette smokers who have only recently stopped smoking; recent being, for example, during the past year?
Blood pressure—Which measurement do I use? The most recent measurement, the average of the last three measurements, the highest recorded measurement, the average of the three highest recorded measurements, or a measurement with the patient seated, standing, or ambulatory, or the patient's own measurement?
Cholesterol concentration—Which measurement is the most appropriate? The most recent measurement, the average of the last three measurements, the highest recorded measurement, or the average of the three highest recorded measurements?
Creatinine concentration—Which measurement is the most appropriate? The most recent measurement, the average of the last three measurements, the highest recorded measurement, or the average of the three highest recorded measurements?
Left ventricular hypertrophy—How should it be defined? By evidence from echocardiography only, or by evidence from electrocardiography?
Ideally I would like to be able to …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27