- Rory McCloy, senior lecturer in surgery (r.mccloy@man.ac.uk)a,
- Robert Stone, visiting professor of virtual reality in surgeryb
- a Wolfson Centre for Minimally Invasive Therapy, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL
- b Clinical Research Divisions I & II, Surgery (University), University of Manchester, Manchester
- Correspondence to: R McCloy
New technologies, in particular virtual reality and robotics, will have a major impact on health care in the next decade. Clinically validated, powerful medical simulators are now available and in use across the world. General surgery leads in the use of simulators, and neurosurgery leads with augmented reality and image guided surgery. Robotics are used in orthopaedics and cardiology. Other virtual reality applications are being used in mental health, anaesthetics, and emergency medicine. Rapid developments in the internet and “e-learning” domains have accelerated the dissemination of simulation techniques, interactive 3D images, and structured courseware. This review describes the application of virtual reality and robotics to surgical training and planning and the execution of procedures in theatre and discusses the near term future of this new technology.
Methods
A successful medical simulator or surgical system based on virtual reality requires the participation of a team of specialists including experts in ergonomics and applied psychology, software engineering and digital 3D design, electromechanical engineering, robotics, and microtechnology. Consequently, no single database adequately covers all the issues involved. This review is based on our experience supplemented with data from searches of Medline and the Ergonomics Information Analysis Centre (University of Birmingham) and of the internet with various web search engines.
Historical perspective
Current virtual reality surgical systems owe their existence to pioneering developments in the early and middle 1980s. Organisations developing robots to replace humans from hostile and hazardous environments—undersea, in nuclear installations, in space, and on the battlefield—turned to an emerging technology that seemed to offer the ideal solution. The developers claimed that, with a special helmet equipped with head tracking devices and 3D displays, it was possible to create an illusion for the wearer that he or she was present in such an environment (“telepresence”) and, with a fibre optic glove, possible for them to …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012