- Eugene Dinkevich, assistant professor of paediatricsa,
- Jordan Hupert, assistant professor of paediatricsb,
- Virginia A Moyer (Virginia.A.Moyer@uth.tmc.edu), associate professor of paediatrics and epidemiologyc
- a Department of Pediatrics, State University of New York at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York, NY11203, USA
- b Division of General Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
- c Center for Population Health and Evidence Based Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas at Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Correspondence to: V A Moyer
This is the first in a series of five articles
THE CASE
Your primary care paediatric practice has recently decided to review its preventive care practices before deciding which to include in a new computerised record system. You know that these practices vary considerably among group members, even as to how many check ups a child really needs. The value of some specific manoeuvres, such as the Adams forward bend test for scoliosis, for which adolescents are often referred from school, is doubted. You determine to find the best evidence for common preventive health interventions for children.
Summary points
Fewer visits than in the standard schedules for children up to age 2 years are sufficient to detect physical abnormalities and psychosocial and developmental outcomes
Group care is as effective as individual care for routine checks
The Adams forward bend test is not accurate enough for screening for idiopathic scoliosis
Proving the value of check ups for healthy children and finding new and more effective ways to provide preventive care to all children remain major challenges
Background
Routine checks on apparently healthy children are an important part of preventive services available for children. In developed countries outside the United States, paediatricians are trained to practise as hospital based specialists providing clinical care, while general practitioners and public health nurses are responsible for preventive care, including care of healthy children.1 In the United States, general paediatricians provide both preventive and clinical care and spend as much as 40% of their time checking healthy children.2
The major objective of these check ups is maintenance of health and prevention of disease. This is traditionally accomplished by repeated evaluations of healthy children under five heads: screening, health promotion, disease prevention, patient management, and follow up.
A routine check up includes history taking, physical examination, observation of parent-child interaction, …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27