Editorials

Postoperative starvation after gastrointestinal surgery

BMJ 2001; 323 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7316.761 (Published 06 October 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:761

Early feeding is beneficial

  1. D B A Silk, consultant physician,
  2. N Menzies Gow, consultant surgeon
  1. Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Central Middlesex Hospital, London NW10 7NS

    Papers p 773

    The widespread practice of starving patients in the immediate period after gastrointestinal surgery has been challenged by a systematic review and meta-analysis in this issue (p 773), which finds that “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery may not be beneficial.1 Further, the apparently beneficial effects of early postoperative enteral feeding on infection rates and length of stay in hospital are compelling arguments in favour of a change in clinical practice.

    The rationale of nil by mouth and gastric decompression is to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting and protect the anastomosis, allowing it time to heal before being stressed by food. Nausea and vomiting, however, occur more commonly after upper gastrointestinal surgery than after resection of the small intestine and colon. In our clinical experience nasogastric decompression can usually be discontinued 12-24 hours after resection of the small intestine and colon.

    There is no evidence that bowel rest and a period of starvation are beneficial for healing of wounds and anastomotic integrity. Indeed, the evidence is that luminal nutrition may enhance wound healing and increase anastomotic strength, …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe