Humans are primates, designed to breast feed for years not months
- Katherine A Dettwyler, associate professor of anthropology and nutrition (kadettwyler@hotmail.com)
- Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4352, USA
- International Health Unit, Macfarlane Burnet Centre for Medical Research, Fairfield, Victoria 3078, Australia
- International Nutrition Research Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's School of Medicine, London SE11 6SP
- Department of Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH
- South Cleveland, Hospital, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ
- Department of Cardiology, Wales Heart Research Institute, University Hospital, Cardiff CF14 4XN
- Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester
- Greenmount Medical Centre, Bury BL8 4DR
- Medical Research Council Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH
- BMJ
EDITOR—With respect to the article by Leeson et al on duration of breast feeding and arterial distensibility in early adult life, of course the duration of breast feeding matters—the longer the better.1
Humans are animals, mammals, and primates. Research on correlates of weaning age in non-human primates, such as adult body size, length of gestation, timing of permanent tooth eruption, timing of sexual maturity, and growth rates during childhood, predict that modern humans should be breast fed for between two and a half and seven years.23 Humans have slightly longer durations of all stages of the life span than our nearest relatives, chimpanzees. We have slightly longer gestation, later dental eruption, later sexual maturity, and therefore would expect slightly later ages of weaning. Chimpanzees breast feed for four to five years. Around the world, many children are breast fed for two and a half to seven years, including some in the United States, Canada, and Great Britain.
Maybe a healthy start in life of several to many years of breast feeding should be followed by a lifelong diet low in animal protein and fat and high in physical exercise, to maximise heart health in adulthood. But we will not know this until researchers study the effects on blood vessel flexibility of normal durations of breast feeding (2.5-7.0 years), and of the combination of normal durations of breast feeding with different post-weaning diets and amounts of exercise. I find it appalling that researchers would suggest that more than four months of breast feeding could be harmful to children, when research shows that 2.5-7.0 years is clearly the normal and natural duration for our species. On a final note, it is always good advice to question the credibility of research and researchers funded by infant formula companies.
Footnotes
-
Competing interests …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Transforming translation
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Bringing Nightingale down to size
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Avoid antimuscarinic drugs in people with dementia
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Re: Strengthening primary health care: Related to the integration of medical training, community service need and health administration
Published 29 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27