This article has a correction
Please see: Complexity and clinical care
- Tim Wilson, director, St Paul RCGP Quality Unit (twilson@rcgp.org.uk)a,
- Tim Holt, general practitionerb,
- Trisha Greenhalgh, professor of primary health carec
- a Royal College of General Practitioners, London SW7 1PU
- b Danby Practice, Dale End Surgery, Danby, Whitby YO21 2JE
- c University College London, London N19 3UA
- Correspondence to: T Wilson
This is the second in a series of four articles
Biological and social systems are inherently complex, so it is hardly surprising that few if any human illnesses can be said to have a single “cause” or “cure.”1 This article applies the principles introduced in the introductory article in this series2 to three specific clinical areas: the control of blood glucose levels in diabetes, the management of diagnostic uncertainty, and health promotion.
A complex adaptive system is a collection of individual agents with freedom to act in ways that are not always totally predictable, and whose actions are interconnected so that the action of one part changes the context for other agents.2 In relation to human health and illness there are several levels of such systems.
The human body is composed of multiple interacting and self regulating physiological systems including biochemical and neuroendocrine feedback loops
The behaviour of any individual is determined partly by an internal set of rules based on past experience and partly by unique and adaptive responses to new stimuli from the environment
The web of relationships in which individuals exist contains many varied and powerful determinants of their beliefs, expectations, and behaviour
Individuals and their immediate social relationships are further embedded within wider social, political, and cultural systems which can influence outcomes in entirely novel and unpredictable ways
All these interacting systems are dynamic and fluid
A small change in one part of this web of interacting systems may lead to a much larger change in another part through amplification effects.
For all these reasons neither illness nor human behaviour is predictable and neither can safely be “modelled” in a simple cause and effect system.3 The human body is not a machine and its malfunctioning cannot be adequately analysed by breaking the …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012