Improving patients' safety by gathering informationBMJ 2001; 323 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7308.298 (Published 11 August 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:298
Anonymous reporting has an important role
- Bill Runciman ([email protected]), president,
- Alan Merry, clinical associate professor,
- Alexander McCall Smith ([email protected]), professor of medical law
- Australian Patient Safety Foundation, GPO Box 400, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia
- Department of Anaesthesia, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
- Faculty of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL
If the current rate of iatrogenic harm in health care is to be reduced there is widespread agreement that we need to identify how and why adverse events occur, and, in particular, how system defects may contribute to their occurrence. This view underlies reports such as An Organisation with a Memory1 in the United Kingdom and similar reports in other countries2 and has led to political commitment to national monitoring systems. As Britain's new National Patient Safety Agency, currently being established, starts to ponder the issue, what are the elements of a successful reporting and monitoring system?
In spite of this recent recognition of the need for monitoring, disagreement remains about the attributes of the ideal reporting system. There are at least two distinct objectives. One is to identify practitioners or units whose performance is substandard and processes, infrastructure, or equipment that are manifestly inadequate or dangerous and to deal with these particular problems at a local level. To do this …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial